Liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis
Perspective

Liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis

Albert Chan

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Corresponding to: Albert Chan. Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Email: acchan@hku.hk.

Submitted Apr 12, 2013. Accepted for publication May 03, 2013.

doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2013.05.01


The rapid progression in the development of liver transplantation during the last decade is largely attributed by the standardization of operative techniques (1,2) and advances in the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive therapy (3). Such improvements in the perioperative management have rendered liver transplantation a safer operation and in turn translated into better long-term survival (4,5). As such, the indication for liver transplantation has been expanded to include malignant liver tumor other than liver cirrhosis. Since the proposal of Milan criteria by Professor Mazzaferro in the late 1990s, liver transplantation has been universally adopted as the curative treatment for early staged hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with liver cirrhosis (6). As a result, the 5-year overall survival rate has reached up to 70% in various series (7,8). More importantly, the introduction of Milan criteria has since revolutionized the indications for transplantation and the allocation policy for cadaveric organs.

As success was witnessed in the surgical management of HCC with transplantation, the indication has been extended to include other form of solid liver malignancies such as neuroendocrine liver metastasis and cholangiocarcinoma in the hope that similar survival outcome could be attained.

Neuroendocrine tumor is a highly vascular tumor with variable aggressiveness. It embraces a wide spectrum of tumor that arises from the neuroendocrine cells in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. For untreated neuroendocrine liver metastasis, the 5-year survival is approximately 30-40%. With transplantation, the survival for patients with unresectable neuroendocrine liver metastasis has drastically improved to 80% at 5 years in recent study (9). On the other hand, transplantation in patients with cholangiocarcinoma had a longer history of development that could be dated back to the early 1990s. At that time, the outcome was rather disappointing with a 5-year survival rate of merely 5-10% (10). With the advancement of chemoradiation in recent years, the survival outcome has been drastically improved. Using the Mayo protocol i.e., neoadjuvant radiotherapy, chemosensitization with 5-FU and oral capecitabine for patients with early cholangiocarcinoma <3 cm and concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis, both the 3- and 5-year survival rates are reported to be approximately 80% respectively (11).

Despite the improved oncological outcome of liver transplantation to non-HCC liver tumor, the experience so far is limited to certain centers only. The lack of enthusiasm of transplant centers to embark on such a program is partly related to the scarcity of donor organ that prohibits a liberal allocation other than to those with end-stage liver diseases or early staged unresectable HCC. Second, the uncertain malignant potential of these tumors and the variable oncological outcomes after transplantation are major concerns for adoption of such treatment strategy. It is noteworthy to highlight that since this group of patients, by enlarge does not have liver failure or complications related to cirrhosis, the primary endpoint that defines the efficacy of transplantation in this setting should be the recurrence-free survival and overall survival. A high recurrence rate after transplantation could potentially pose another challenge to the clinicians. From our experience in HCC, recurrence after liver transplantation is often extrahepatic (12) and the lack of effective treatment options for extrahepatic recurrences is another important reason that limits the widespread application of transplantation to other types of liver malignancy.

As the incidence of colorectal cancer is on a rising trend in the developed world, it is conceivable to anticipate that the frequency of colorectal liver metastasis is bound to increase in the forthcoming era. Resection has been proven to be an efficacious treatment for colorectal liver metastasis with a 5-year survival rate of 40-50% (13,14). However, multiple bilobar liver metastases occur frequently that often preclude patients from potentially curative resection. In the May 2013 issue of Annals of Surgery, Hagness and co-workers proposed the use of transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis and reported their preliminary experience in twenty-one patients (15). The 5-year overall survival rate was 60% and eight patients remained eligible for further treatment when recurrences were developed. Although the findings of this study seemed to be rather promising, one has to be cautious on further analyzing their results. First, there were no standardized selection criteria for recruitment of patients for this treatment. Second, the follow up duration was merely 27 months with less than 50% of patients available for assessment at 3 years. More importantly, only 35% patients remained recurrence free at one year and no patient was recurrence free at two years. With regard to the post-transplant management, mTOR inhibitor was the preferred immunosuppressive agent for this cohort of patients. It remains questionable if mTOR inhibitor could inhibit the proliferation of metastatic cancer cells and in light of a 38% acute cellular rejection rate among their patients, the efficacy of adopting such immunosuppressive regimen is certainly subject to skepticism.

In my opinion, it is difficult to concur with the authors that liver transplantation is a feasible treatment for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis based on the survival figures that were provided by Hagness and co-workers (15). More clinical data needs to be accumulated by this center before we can truly ‘say’ this treatment strategy is feasible with oncological benefit. Until this time, liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis should not be undertaken as a routine procedure.


Acknowledgements

Disclosure: The author declares no conflict of interest.


References

  1. Chan SC, Lo CM, Fan ST. Simplifying living donor liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2010;9:9-14. [PubMed]
  2. Chan SC, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Toward current standards of donor right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult live donor liver transplantation through the experience of 200 cases. Ann Surg 2007;245:110-7. [PubMed]
  3. O’Grady JG, Burroughs A, Hardy P, et al. Tacrolimus versus microemulsified ciclosporin in liver transplantation: the TMC randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002;360:1119-25. [PubMed]
  4. Hwang S, Lee SG, Lee YJ, et al. Lessons learned from 1,000 living donor liver transplantations in a single center: how to make living donations safe. Liver Transpl 2006;12:920-7. [PubMed]
  5. Chan SC, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. A decade of right liver adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: the recipient mid-term outcomes. Ann Surg 2008;248:411-9. [PubMed]
  6. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 1996;334:693-9. [PubMed]
  7. Ng KK, Lo CM, Chan SC, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the Hong Kong experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2010;17:548-54. [PubMed]
  8. Kulik LM, Fisher RA, Rodrigo DR, et al. Outcomes of living and deceased donor liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the A2ALL cohort. Am J Transplant 2012;12:2997-3007. [PubMed]
  9. Olausson M, Friman S, Herlenius G, et al. Orthotopic liver or multivisceral transplantation as treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Liver Transpl 2007;13:327-33. [PubMed]
  10. Castaldo ET, Pinson CW. Liver transplantation for non-hepatocellular carcinoma malignancy. HPB (Oxford) 2007;9:98-103. [PubMed]
  11. Rea DJ, Heimbach JK, Rosen CB, et al. Liver transplantation with neoadjuvant chemoradiation is more effective than resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2005;242:451-8; discussion 458-61. [PubMed]
  12. Chok KS, Chan SC, Cheung TT, et al. Late recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. World J Surg 2011;35:2058-62. [PubMed]
  13. Mayo SC, Pulitano C, Marques H, et al. Surgical management of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: a multicenter international analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2013;216:707-16. [PubMed]
  14. Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN, Ellis LM, et al. Recurrence and outcomes following hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, and combined resection/ablation for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 2004;239:818-25; discussion 825-7. [PubMed]
  15. Hagness M, Foss A, Line PD, et al. Liver transplantation for nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2013;257:800-6. [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Chan A. Liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2013;2(3):162-164. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2013.05.01

Download Citation